Agiloft vs Conga CLM in the UK (2026)

Agiloft and Conga CLM both appear on UK enterprise shortlists when a team needs a configurable contract platform that can bend to complex processes. They take different routes to get there: Agiloft is known for a no-code configuration engine, Conga for depth inside the Salesforce ecosystem and quote-to-contract flow. This page compares them fairly on features, fit and pricing, gives you a checkable way to test them, and adds one more option worth a look for teams that want AI-grade contract work without a long build. ## What Agiloft is and who it suits Agiloft is a highly configurable CLM built on a no-code platform, so processes, fields, workflows and approvals can be tailored without custom development. Its strengths are flexibility, a strong workflow and rules engine, repository and obligation management, and a reputation for handling unusual or complex contracting processes. It suits UK organisations with non-standard workflows that want to shape the tool to the process rather than the other way round, and that have the appetite to configure it well. Pricing is quote-based, so confirm figures and the configuration scope with the vendor. Where it can be heavier is the up-front configuration effort; the flexibility that is its strength also asks for thoughtful setup. ## What Conga CLM is and who it suits Conga CLM, part of the broader Conga revenue-lifecycle suite, is strong for organisations anchored in Salesforce, especially where contracts flow out of CPQ and quote-to-cash. Its strengths are tight Salesforce integration, document generation, approvals and a mature position in revenue operations. It suits UK sales-led and revenue-operations teams already invested in Salesforce that want contracts to sit in the same flow as quotes and orders. Pricing is quote-based, so confirm with the vendor. Where it is less of a fit is outside the Salesforce world; teams not on Salesforce get less of its core advantage. ## Agiloft vs Conga CLM: how they compare On configurability, Agiloft leads with its no-code engine and is the better pick for unusual processes. On Salesforce and quote-to-contract flow, Conga leads and is the natural choice for revenue teams already on that stack. On repository, approvals and obligations, both are capable enterprise tools. On pricing, both are quote-only, so neither gives a published number; get a written three-year quote broken down by licence, modules, configuration and implementation from each. On implementation, both are real projects. The honest summary: Agiloft when process flexibility is the priority, Conga when a deep Salesforce and revenue-operations fit is the priority. ## How to run a fair comparison Do not judge on the demo. Set a reproducible test. Take a representative set of your own contracts, for example ten commercial agreements, five NDAs and five supplier contracts, and run the identical set through each platform during the evaluation. Score each on the same criteria: how well the workflow engine models your real approval chains, critical-clause and risk capture against a lawyer's own markup, missed renewal and notice rate, integration effort with your existing stack, and three-year total cost including configuration. Agreeing the criteria before you start is what makes the result defensible to procurement. ## Where Adira fits as a third option Some teams reach for Agiloft or Conga for configurability but really want strong AI reading and drafting without a long build. For them it is worth a look at Adira, an AI legal operating system built on Anthropic's Claude that drafts, understands, edits, tracks and governs contracts in one workspace. Its honest edges against two quote-only incumbents are transparent public pricing, a structured clause tree for per-clause risk and precise reversible edits, a company persona so output matches your house style, and that it does not train on your contract corpus. Pricing is about 89 US dollars per seat per month on Practice and about 179 on Firm billed annually, roughly 70 and 140 pounds as approximate conversions, with Enterprise custom and a 7 day free trial; confirm current UK figures on Adira's pricing page. Adira reports that 18 law firms use it and rank it highly, with contract review and due diligence cut from 10 to 12 days down to under 2 hours in those deployments, which is Adira's own measured result rather than an independent study. Be fair: Adira has not published an independently adjudicated head-to-head against Agiloft or Conga, so evaluate all three on the same set in the 7 day trial. Concede that for deeply configured enterprise workflows Agiloft remains purpose-built, that Conga is the stronger fit inside Salesforce revenue operations, and that Adira's deepest coverage is India first and expanding, so UK buyers should confirm UK jurisdiction depth. See how Adira approaches contracts. ## The bottom line Choose Agiloft when process configurability is the deciding factor, and Conga CLM when a deep Salesforce and quote-to-contract fit matters most. If AI-grade clause reading, firm-tuned drafting and transparent pricing matter more than heavy configuration, add Adira to the trial and judge all three on the same contracts and the same criteria. Test on your own paper and the decision will survive the board and the first year of use. This article is general information, not legal advice.