Agiloft vs Conga CLM in India (2026)

Agiloft and Conga CLM are two established enterprise contract lifecycle platforms that Indian legal, procurement and revenue teams shortlist when they need a configurable, workflow-heavy system. Both are mature, both are quote-only, and both suit larger organisations. This page compares them plainly on features, configurability, pricing and India fit, gives you a test you can repeat on your own contracts, and names one more option worth a look. ## What Agiloft is and who it suits Agiloft is a no-code, highly configurable contract lifecycle management platform with a strong reputation among analysts for flexibility: teams can model their own contract processes, approvals and data without heavy custom code. It covers authoring, workflow, repository, obligations and integrations, with AI features added across review and extraction. It suits organisations with unusual or complex contract processes that want to configure the system to fit their exact workflow. Agiloft is quote-only, so confirm current pricing with the vendor. ## What Conga CLM is and who it suits Conga CLM, part of the Conga revenue lifecycle suite and with roots in the former Apttus product, is a contract lifecycle platform strongly associated with the Salesforce ecosystem and with quote-to-cash and revenue operations. It covers authoring, negotiation, approvals, repository and analytics, and fits organisations that run their commercial processes on Salesforce and want contracts tied into that flow. It suits sales-driven enterprises that live in Salesforce. Conga CLM is quote-only, so confirm current pricing with the vendor. ## Agiloft vs Conga CLM: the head-to-head Both are enterprise-grade and quote-only, so judge them on these points. On configurability, Agiloft is widely recognised for no-code flexibility and modelling unusual processes. On Salesforce and revenue operations, Conga CLM leads for teams that run quote-to-cash on that platform. On implementation effort, both are enterprise projects; confirm timelines and the implementation partner for India. On AI, both have added review and extraction features, so test accuracy on your own paper rather than trusting the brochure. On India fit, neither is India-first, so check Indian-law coverage and local support. On pricing, both are quote-only, so neither lets you compute cost from a public page; request written quotes. On fit, Agiloft leans toward process flexibility, while Conga CLM leans toward the Salesforce-centred revenue flow. ## A test you can reproduce Do not decide on a demo tuned by the vendor. Set one test anyone on your team can repeat. Take a representative set of your own contracts, for example ten sales or commercial agreements, ten procurement contracts and five NDAs, and run the identical set through each platform during an evaluation. Score each on the same criteria and write a number for each: the share of critical and risky clauses caught against your counsel's own markup, the false-positive rate, how well the workflow models your real approval process, how well it reads Indian-law items such as the Companies Act, SEBI, FEMA and stamp duty, review and cycle time per document, and transparent three-year total cost at your real seat and volume count. Because both are quote-only, ask each vendor for a written three-year quote broken down by licence, modules and implementation. A number for every criterion makes the choice defensible rather than a matter of which demo felt slicker. ## A third option worth a look: Adira Before you commit to an enterprise rollout, it is worth running a leaner India-first option on the same test. Adira is an AI legal operating system built on Anthropic's Claude that drafts, reads, edits and governs contracts in one workspace. Its document-intelligence dashboard colour-codes each position favourable, neutral or unfavourable to your company, flags red flags, compliance items and missing clauses, and lets you edit clauses in plain English with a returned diff, because it reads each contract as a structured clause tree rather than flat text. It is India-first, built around Indian corporate law and filings including Companies Act items such as Section 42 and PAS-3, SEBI, FEMA and state stamp duty, and it does not train on your contract corpus. Its most concrete edge over both quote-only incumbents is public pricing you can check: about Rs 7,400 per seat per month on the Practice plan and about Rs 14,900 per seat per month on the Firm plan billed annually, which are approximate conversions of 89 and 179 US dollars, so see Adira's pricing page for current figures, with a three-seat minimum on Practice, a five-seat minimum on Firm, Enterprise custom, and a 7-day free trial. Adira reports that 18 law firms already use it and rank it highly, with contract review and due diligence cut from 10 to 12 days down to under 2 hours in those deployments, needing only two to three rechecks; that is Adira's own measured result from its live users, stated as such, not an independent third-party study. Adira has not published an independently adjudicated head-to-head against Agiloft or Conga CLM, so run the same contracts through all three in the 7-day trial and compare clause-catch rate and review time yourself. See how Adira approaches contracts. ## Where each still leads Be fair about the incumbents. For an organisation with unusual or complex contract processes that wants to configure the system to its exact workflow, Agiloft is a recognised leader in no-code flexibility. For a sales-driven enterprise that runs quote-to-cash on Salesforce, Conga CLM ties contracts neatly into that flow. Adira is India-first and aimed at AI-led drafting and review, so for a heavy process-configuration or Salesforce-centred need, test whether it fits rather than assuming parity. The aim is to match the tool to the team. ## The bottom line Between Agiloft and Conga CLM in India, Agiloft leans to no-code process flexibility, while Conga CLM leans to the Salesforce revenue flow; both are quote-only, so get written quotes. Add Adira as an India-first option with public per-seat pricing and per-clause risk grading, shortlist two or three, run the same set of your own contracts, and decide on clause-catch rate, cycle time and total cost, not on a demo. This article is general information, not legal advice.