Can I claim for lost profits if a supplier breaches a contract?

Only if you notified the supplier before signing that breach would cause lost profits. If the supplier knew the loss was likely to result from their breach, you can claim it under Section 73. Without advance notice, lost profits are usually treated as too remote. Include this risk explicitly in the contract or communicate it documented.

What does 'naturally arose in the usual course of things' mean?

It means direct, immediate losses that typically follow from the specific type of breach. For a late delivery, higher purchase costs from an alternative supplier would qualify. Losses must be a standard, foreseeable consequence of that breach type, not unusual circumstances. Remote chains of causation don't qualify.

How do I protect myself from unlimited damages liability?

Draft clear liability caps, exclusions for indirect and consequential damages, and mitigation clauses. Define exactly what losses are recoverable in your contract. Use liquidated damages clauses if both parties prefer certainty. Without these, Section 73 applies and damages are limited by foreseeability, which courts interpret narrowly and unpredictably.

Does Section 73 apply to all contracts in India?

Yes, Section 73 is the default rule for all contracts governed by Indian law unless the contract explicitly modifies or excludes it. You can negotiate stricter limits, exclude categories of loss, or set fixed damages amounts. The parties have freedom to contract around Section 73, so always include damage provisions in your agreement.

Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872: Compensation for loss or damage caused by breach of contract

Section 73 Indian Contract Act: What damages can you recover for breach? Limits on compensable losses, contract drafting tips.

The provision

When a contract has been broken, the party who suffers by such breach is entitled to receive, from the party who has broken the contract, compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which naturally arose in the usual course of things from such breach, or which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it. Such compensation is not to be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach.

Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 73. Official text.

What Section 73 Means

Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act establishes the right to claim damages when someone breaks a contract. If one party fails to fulfill their contractual obligations, the injured party can seek compensation from the breaching party. However, this compensation is limited to losses that are foreseeable and directly connected to the breach, not remote or speculative losses.

The Two Types of Recoverable Losses

Damages under Section 73 cover two categories. First, losses that naturally arise from the breach in the ordinary course of events. For example, if a supplier fails to deliver materials, the buyer can claim the cost of sourcing alternatives at higher prices. Second, losses that both parties anticipated when signing the contract as a probable consequence of breach. This requires evidence that the parties discussed or were aware of the specific risk at contract formation.

Crucially, compensation excludes remote and indirect losses. Courts interpret this strictly. If a manufacturing delay causes your factory to shut down, leading to layoffs and reputational harm, you cannot claim compensation for employee severance or lost market share unless you explicitly notified the other party of these downstream consequences when contracting.

Drafting and Contract Implications

This provision creates significant liability exposure and affects how you should structure contracts. To protect yourself and clarify expectations, consider these approaches:

Damages clauses: Define what constitutes recoverable loss by specifying metrics, caps, or calculation methods. Without clarity, courts apply Section 73's restrictive framework, often limiting recovery.

Liability caps: Use maximum damages limits to control exposure. Courts generally enforce these unless they are unconscionable.

Notification of consequential losses: If you fear downstream impacts (lost profits, business interruption, third-party claims), explicitly communicate these risks to the other party before signing. Document this conversation. Doing so may bring these losses within the "parties knew" category.

Exclusion clauses: Expressly exclude liability for indirect, incidental, or consequential damages. This is common in IT, supply, and service contracts.

Mitigation obligations: Insert clauses requiring the injured party to take reasonable steps to reduce losses. Courts expect this under Indian law anyway, but explicit language avoids disputes.

Liquidated damages vs. unliquidated: Consider whether a fixed penalty for breach serves both parties better than leaving damages uncertain under Section 73.

Without these provisions, you rely on court interpretation of "natural" and "foreseeable," which varies and delays recovery. In negotiation, push back on blanket liability acceptance. The other party must bear only proportionate, predictable risk.

This page explains the law in general terms for information only. It is not legal advice. Always read the provision in its official source and take advice on your specific facts.

Frequently asked questions

Can I claim for lost profits if a supplier breaches a contract?: Only if you notified the supplier before signing that breach would cause lost profits. If the supplier knew the loss was likely to result from their breach, you can claim it under Section 73. Without advance notice, lost profits are usually treated as too remote. Include this risk explicitly in the contract or communicate it documented.
What does 'naturally arose in the usual course of things' mean?: It means direct, immediate losses that typically follow from the specific type of breach. For a late delivery, higher purchase costs from an alternative supplier would qualify. Losses must be a standard, foreseeable consequence of that breach type, not unusual circumstances. Remote chains of causation don't qualify.
How do I protect myself from unlimited damages liability?: Draft clear liability caps, exclusions for indirect and consequential damages, and mitigation clauses. Define exactly what losses are recoverable in your contract. Use liquidated damages clauses if both parties prefer certainty. Without these, Section 73 applies and damages are limited by foreseeability, which courts interpret narrowly and unpredictably.
Does Section 73 apply to all contracts in India?: Yes, Section 73 is the default rule for all contracts governed by Indian law unless the contract explicitly modifies or excludes it. You can negotiate stricter limits, exclude categories of loss, or set fixed damages amounts. The parties have freedom to contract around Section 73, so always include damage provisions in your agreement.

Related in the library

Adira drafts and reviews contracts under the law of the jurisdiction they work in.

See Adira