Can an indemnity clause in an Indian MSA exclude indirect or consequential damages?

Yes, and this is strongly recommended. Under Section 125 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an indemnifier is liable only for losses directly caused by the indemnified event unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. Explicitly carving out indirect, consequential, punitive, and lost-profit damages is enforceable and standard practice. Courts will not imply a duty to indemnify for remote or speculative losses.

Should the indemnity cap in an Indian MSA be the same as the overall liability cap?

Market practice varies, but IP infringement indemnities are often left uncapped or capped separately at 2x annual contract value, while general operational indemnities typically follow the overall liability cap. This reflects the greater potential exposure from IP claims. Negotiate based on risk assessment and sector norms; ensure the choice aligns with insurance coverage.

What happens if a claim is partly caused by both parties in an Indian MSA indemnity?

Indian courts will reduce or eliminate indemnity recovery if the indemnified party materially contributed to the loss through its own negligence or breach. To protect against this, expressly exclude claims arising from the indemnified party's sole or joint negligence and require prompt notification and control of defense by the indemnifier.

How long should an indemnity survive termination of an Indian MSA?

Standard survival periods in India are 2 to 5 years post-termination for IP and general breach claims. Shorter survival (1 year) may apply to operational indemnities. The clause should explicitly state the survival period; absent clarity, Indian courts may imply a reasonable period based on the nature of the claim and industry practice.

The indemnity clause in a master services agreement (MSA) under India law

Indian MSA indemnity clause guidance: scope, legal basis under Contract Act 1872, negotiation strategy, caps, and common pitfalls for service agreements.

Standard Position

In Indian master services agreements, an indemnity clause typically requires the service provider to indemnify (compensate and defend) the service recipient against losses, damages, liabilities, and costs arising from the service provider's breach, negligence, or violation of law. The indemnifying party usually bears legal costs and settlement expenses. Market practice in India favors mutual indemnities: the provider indemnifies the recipient for third-party IP infringement claims and performance failures, while the recipient indemnifies the provider for misuse of services or breach of usage restrictions. Caps on indemnity obligations are common and often mirror overall liability caps, though IP infringement claims are frequently carved out or uncapped.

Legal Basis

Indemnity in India is governed by Sections 124 to 130 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Section 124 defines an indemnity as a contract by which one party promises to save the other from loss caused by the conduct of the promisor or by the conduct of any other person. Critically, Indian law requires that indemnities be specific and clear; vague or overly broad indemnities may be construed against the drafter under the contra proferentem rule. Section 125 specifies that an indemnifier is liable for losses directly caused by the indemnified event, but not for remote, speculative, or indirect losses unless expressly included. The Information Technology Act, 2000, and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, also affect indemnity in contracts involving data protection, cybersecurity, and criminal liability.

Drafting and Negotiation

Key negotiation points include: (1) Scope definition. Clearly specify which losses are indemnifiable: third-party claims, regulatory fines, reputational harm, and business interruption should be separately addressed or excluded. Indian courts scrutinize undefined terms like 'losses' and 'damages'. (2) Causation chain. Expressly state whether indirect, consequential, or punitive damages are included or excluded. Indian contract law distinguishes direct from indirect losses; exclude the latter unless business practice demands otherwise. (3) Monetary cap. Align the indemnity cap with the overall liability cap or set a separate, negotiated limit. For IP indemnities, parties often leave these uncapped or capped at 2x annual contract value. (4) Procedure and control. Require the indemnified party to promptly notify the indemnifier of claims and grant the indemnifier sole control of defense and settlement. Indian courts may reduce indemnity recovery if the indemnified party materially contributed to the loss. (5) Exclusions and carve-outs. Exclude claims arising from the indemnified party's sole negligence, misuse, or modification. (6) Survival. State whether the indemnity survives termination; standard practice is 2 to 5 years post-termination for IP claims.

Common Pitfalls

Drafters often include indemnities without defining 'loss' or 'claim,' leading to disputes over what is recoverable. Bidirectional indemnities with unequal scopes (e.g., provider indemnifies for all IP infringement but recipient only for gross negligence) create enforcement asymmetry. Failing to exclude claims caused partly by the indemnified party's conduct may render the clause unenforceable under Indian law, as indemnity cannot be used to shield one party from its own wilful acts or gross negligence. Using blanket language such as 'indemnify against all claims' without limitation may be struck down as unreasonable restraint. Finally, omitting procedural controls (notice, defense control, settlement consent) weakens the indemnifier's ability to limit exposure and may be viewed as an unreasonable forfeit of contractual rights.

Sample language

The Service Provider shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Client from and against any third-party claims, judgments, damages, and reasonable costs (including attorney fees) arising from or related to (i) the Service Provider's breach of this Agreement, (ii) the Service Provider's negligence or willful misconduct, or (iii) infringement of any intellectual property right by the Services, provided the Client promptly notifies the Service Provider of the claim and grants the Service Provider sole control of defense and settlement. The Service Provider's total indemnity obligation shall not exceed the liability cap set in Section [X], except for IP infringement claims, which shall remain uncapped. The Service Provider shall have no obligation to indemnify to the extent a claim arises from the Client's sole negligence, misuse, or material breach of this Agreement.

This is general drafting guidance, not legal advice, and not a substitute for advice on your specific facts and jurisdiction. Sample language is a starting point to adapt, not a finished clause.

Frequently asked questions

Can an indemnity clause in an Indian MSA exclude indirect or consequential damages?: Yes, and this is strongly recommended. Under Section 125 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an indemnifier is liable only for losses directly caused by the indemnified event unless the parties expressly agree otherwise. Explicitly carving out indirect, consequential, punitive, and lost-profit damages is enforceable and standard practice. Courts will not imply a duty to indemnify for remote or speculative losses.
Should the indemnity cap in an Indian MSA be the same as the overall liability cap?: Market practice varies, but IP infringement indemnities are often left uncapped or capped separately at 2x annual contract value, while general operational indemnities typically follow the overall liability cap. This reflects the greater potential exposure from IP claims. Negotiate based on risk assessment and sector norms; ensure the choice aligns with insurance coverage.
What happens if a claim is partly caused by both parties in an Indian MSA indemnity?: Indian courts will reduce or eliminate indemnity recovery if the indemnified party materially contributed to the loss through its own negligence or breach. To protect against this, expressly exclude claims arising from the indemnified party's sole or joint negligence and require prompt notification and control of defense by the indemnifier.
How long should an indemnity survive termination of an Indian MSA?: Standard survival periods in India are 2 to 5 years post-termination for IP and general breach claims. Shorter survival (1 year) may apply to operational indemnities. The clause should explicitly state the survival period; absent clarity, Indian courts may imply a reasonable period based on the nature of the claim and industry practice.

Related in the library

Adira drafts and reviews contracts under the law of the jurisdiction they work in.

See Adira