Can an Indian NDA be governed by foreign law such as English or New York law?

Yes, parties have freedom to choose foreign law under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but this is uncommon and impractical for domestic transactions. Foreign governing law complicates enforcement in Indian courts and arbitration, and Indian courts may not be familiar with foreign statutes; Indian law is preferred and more easily enforced in Indian judicial proceedings.

What is the difference between governing law and jurisdiction in an Indian NDA?

Governing law specifies which state's or country's substantive law applies to interpret the contract (e.g., Maharashtra law). Jurisdiction determines which courts or arbitration panels will hear disputes (e.g., courts in Mumbai, or arbitration in Delhi). A single NDA can have Indian law as governing law but choose international arbitration as the dispute forum.

Do I need to name a specific Indian state in the governing law clause, or can I just say 'laws of India'?

Naming a specific state (Delhi, Maharashtra, Karnataka) is best practice because different Indian states have different property laws and procedural rules. A vague reference to 'laws of India' may force a court to determine which state's laws apply, creating uncertainty and potential litigation.

If the governing law clause specifies Delhi law, will confidentiality protections in the Patents Act or Indian Penal Code still apply?

Yes, statutory protections such as Section 72 of the Indian Penal Code (breach of confidence) and trade secret definitions in the Patents Act apply as mandatory law regardless of which governing law clause you choose. These provisions override contractual choice of law for matters of public policy.

The governing law clause in a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) under India law

Governing law in Indian NDAs: choose state law, arbitration venue, and statutory overlaps under the Indian Contract Act and Arbitration Act.

Standard Position

In Indian NDAs, the governing law clause typically specifies that the agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India, often naming a specific state (commonly Delhi, Maharashtra, or Karnataka). This is the default expectation for domestic transactions. For cross-border NDAs involving Indian parties, it is common to elect Indian law as the governing law while choosing international arbitration as the dispute resolution mechanism. Indian courts and international arbitrators generally respect party autonomy in selecting governing law under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, provided the choice is not contrary to public policy.

Legal Basis

The Indian Contract Act, 1872 does not prescribe mandatory governing law rules; instead, it recognizes freedom of contract. Section 23 states that agreements in restraint of trade or contrary to public policy are void, but this does not prohibit choice of law clauses. The Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 further support contractual freedom regarding choice of law and dispute resolution. However, confidentiality and trade secret protections in India are also governed by common law principles (breach of confidence), statutory frameworks (Patents Act, 1970; Trade Marks Act, 1999; Copyright Act, 1957), and the Indian Penal Code (Section 72 regarding confidential information). A governing law clause should align with these concurrent regimes to ensure enforceability.

Drafting and Negotiation

When drafting the governing law clause in an Indian NDA, parties should specify not only which state or national law applies but also clarify which courts have jurisdiction. The clause should read: "This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of [State], India, without regard to conflict of law principles." The phrase "without regard to conflict of law principles" prevents a court from applying another jurisdiction's laws. For international NDAs, parties often add: "Any dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be resolved through arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seated in [City, India], with English as the language of arbitration." This approach allows Indian law to govern substantive rights while using neutral dispute resolution. Negotiation typically focuses on whether the governing law will be Delhi (seat of many multinational companies and the High Court), Mumbai (financial hub), Bangalore (IT hub), or the state where performance occurs. Carefully consider whether a single governing law applies to the entire NDA or whether different provisions (e.g., liability, confidentiality, non-compete) fall under different regimes. Parties should also clarify that statutory protections for confidential information (e.g., under the Patents Act or common law) apply regardless of the chosen law.

Common Pitfalls

A frequent mistake is selecting a foreign governing law (e.g., English law or New York law) for a purely domestic Indian NDA, creating unnecessary complexity and foreign enforcement risk. Indian courts may not readily enforce foreign judgments without reciprocal treaties, and arbitration awards based on foreign law still require Indian court recognition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Another pitfall is omitting the conflict of law carve-out, which can lead courts to apply another jurisdiction's substantive law. Parties sometimes fail to coordinate the governing law clause with the dispute resolution clause, creating ambiguity about which law applies to procedural versus substantive issues. Additionally, vague references (e.g., "laws of India" without naming a state) can lead to disputes if the NDA involves parties in multiple Indian states; the court will need to determine which state's laws apply. Finally, many drafters overlook that certain statutory protections (e.g., Section 72 of the Indian Penal Code on breach of confidentiality, or the Patents Act definition of trade secrets) apply as a matter of public policy regardless of choice of law, so the governing law clause should be read alongside these mandatory provisions.

Sample language

This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India, without regard to conflict of law principles. Each party irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in [Delhi/Mumbai/Bangalore], India, or to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seated in [City], India. Nothing in this clause shall exclude the application of mandatory statutory protections for confidential information under Indian law, including but not limited to the Patents Act, 1970 and the Indian Penal Code.

This is general drafting guidance, not legal advice, and not a substitute for advice on your specific facts and jurisdiction. Sample language is a starting point to adapt, not a finished clause.

Frequently asked questions

Can an Indian NDA be governed by foreign law such as English or New York law?: Yes, parties have freedom to choose foreign law under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but this is uncommon and impractical for domestic transactions. Foreign governing law complicates enforcement in Indian courts and arbitration, and Indian courts may not be familiar with foreign statutes; Indian law is preferred and more easily enforced in Indian judicial proceedings.
What is the difference between governing law and jurisdiction in an Indian NDA?: Governing law specifies which state's or country's substantive law applies to interpret the contract (e.g., Maharashtra law). Jurisdiction determines which courts or arbitration panels will hear disputes (e.g., courts in Mumbai, or arbitration in Delhi). A single NDA can have Indian law as governing law but choose international arbitration as the dispute forum.
Do I need to name a specific Indian state in the governing law clause, or can I just say 'laws of India'?: Naming a specific state (Delhi, Maharashtra, Karnataka) is best practice because different Indian states have different property laws and procedural rules. A vague reference to 'laws of India' may force a court to determine which state's laws apply, creating uncertainty and potential litigation.
If the governing law clause specifies Delhi law, will confidentiality protections in the Patents Act or Indian Penal Code still apply?: Yes, statutory protections such as Section 72 of the Indian Penal Code (breach of confidence) and trade secret definitions in the Patents Act apply as mandatory law regardless of which governing law clause you choose. These provisions override contractual choice of law for matters of public policy.

Related in the library

Adira drafts and reviews contracts under the law of the jurisdiction they work in.

See Adira