contracts
The Key Clauses in a Term Sheet, Explained
Adira EditorialLegal AI desk5 min read
What are the key clauses in a term sheet? A term sheet is a short document that sets out the main terms on which an investor proposes to invest in a company, usually ahead of a priced equity round. Most of it is non-binding: it is a summary the lawyers turn into full agreements, though a few clauses such as confidentiality and exclusivity do bind. Its key clauses are the valuation and investment amount, the security type, the liquidation preference, anti-dilution protection, board composition, voting and protective provisions, pre-emptive and pro-rata rights, rights of first refusal and co-sale, founder vesting, the ESOP pool, confidentiality, exclusivity (the no-shop), conditions precedent, and which parts are binding. Each is explained below. This is general information, not legal or financial advice. For any real round, use an experienced startup lawyer, because the term sheet sets the shape of every agreement that follows. ## Valuation, investment and security type The valuation clause states the company's value, split into pre-money (value before the new money) and post-money (pre-money plus the investment). The investment clause sets how much the investor puts in and the resulting percentage. The security clause names what the investor receives, usually preference shares; in India these are commonly compulsorily convertible preference shares (CCPS). These three clauses set the price of the deal; the rest set the rights that come with it. ## Liquidation preference The liquidation preference decides who gets paid first, and how much, if the company is sold or wound up. A 1x non-participating preference (the investor takes their money back or converts to ordinary shares, whichever is greater) is the founder-friendly norm. A participating preference lets the investor take their money back and share in the rest, which can heavily reduce the founders' return on a modest exit. A multiple higher than 1x is aggressive. This clause often matters more than valuation on a real exit, so read it closely. ## Anti-dilution The anti-dilution clause protects the investor if the company later raises at a lower price (a down round). Broad-based weighted average is the common, fairer version, adjusting the investor's conversion price modestly. Full ratchet is harsh: it reprices the earlier investment as if it had been made at the lower price, taking a large bite out of the founders. Push for weighted average. ## Board, voting and protective provisions The board clause sets who sits on the board and how seats are allocated between founders and investors. The voting clause and the protective provisions list the decisions that need investor consent, such as taking on debt, selling the company, changing the share capital, or amending the constitution. Reasonable protective provisions are normal; an overlong list can leave founders needing permission to run the business day to day, so the fight is to keep the list to genuinely major matters. ## Pre-emptive, pro-rata, ROFR and co-sale rights Pre-emptive and pro-rata rights let the investor keep their percentage by investing in future rounds. A right of first refusal (ROFR) lets the company or investors buy shares a founder wants to sell before an outsider can. Co-sale (tag-along) rights let the investor join a founder's share sale on the same terms. Together with drag-along rights (which can force minority holders to join a sale the majority approves), these control how and when shares can change hands. ## Founder vesting and the ESOP pool The vesting clause puts the founders' own shares on a vesting schedule, often four years with a one-year cliff, so a founder who leaves early does not keep all their equity. Investors insist on this to keep founders committed. The ESOP clause sets aside a pool of shares for employees. Watch where the pool comes from: if it is created pre-money, it dilutes the founders alone, so its size and timing are a real negotiation. ## Confidentiality, exclusivity and what binds The confidentiality clause and the exclusivity or no-shop clause are usually the binding parts of a term sheet: the no-shop stops the company talking to other investors for a set period while the deal is worked up. The conditions precedent list what must happen before the money moves, such as due diligence and board approvals. The binding-effect clause states plainly which terms bind and which do not, so no one mistakes a non-binding summary for a signed deal. ## A quick priority check - Is the valuation clear on a pre-money and post-money basis?
- Is the liquidation preference 1x and non-participating, or something more aggressive?
- Is anti-dilution weighted average rather than full ratchet?
- Are the protective provisions limited to genuinely major decisions?
- Is the ESOP pool created pre-money or post-money, and how long is the no-shop? The economics live in the valuation, the liquidation preference and anti-dilution; the control lives in the board, voting and protective provisions. A term sheet is mostly non-binding, but it anchors everything that follows, so the time to negotiate is now, not in the long-form documents. One practical habit helps more than any single clause: do not negotiate each term in isolation. A founder can often trade a point on one clause for a point on another, for example accepting a slightly lower valuation in return for a cleaner, non-participating liquidation preference, because the preference may matter far more on the actual exit. Read the sheet as a whole, model the outcome on a realistic exit, and decide which two or three terms you most want to win before you reply. This is general information, not legal or financial advice; practice varies by jurisdiction. ## Where a contract workspace helps Once you understand a term sheet, the real work begins. A term sheet is mostly non-binding, but it anchors the liquidation preference, anti-dilution, board rights and vesting that the long-form documents will carry, so what you agree here has to be tracked through every agreement that follows. That is easier when drafting, reviewing, tracking and governing a term sheet and the deal documents it shapes live in one AI workspace tuned to your company. A platform like Adira is built on this single-workspace idea, keeping the terms you negotiated connected to the agreements they turn into. The explainer above is enough to read a term sheet well; a workspace simply keeps its terms and dates joined up with the rest of what you sign.
Frequently asked questions
- Is a term sheet legally binding?
- Mostly not. A term sheet is largely a non-binding summary that the lawyers turn into full agreements. However, a few clauses usually do bind, typically confidentiality and the exclusivity or no-shop clause, and sometimes who pays costs. A good term sheet states plainly which terms are binding and which are not, so no one treats a summary as a signed deal.
- Which term sheet clause matters most on an exit?
- The liquidation preference. It decides who gets paid first, and how much, if the company is sold. A 1x non-participating preference is the founder-friendly norm; a participating preference or a multiple higher than 1x can sharply reduce the founders' return on a modest exit. On a real sale, this clause often matters more than the headline valuation.
- What is the difference between full ratchet and weighted average anti-dilution?
- Both protect an investor if the company later raises at a lower price. Weighted average, usually broad-based, adjusts the investor's conversion price modestly and is the common, fairer version. Full ratchet reprices the earlier investment as if it had been made at the new lower price, which takes a large bite out of the founders. Founders should push for weighted average.
Sources
Was this useful?
See how Adira drafts in your voice and reads contracts from your side.
Explore the showroomWorking through a contract like this? Weave is Adira’s free tool to read, mark up, and connect any contract in your browser — no account needed.
Try Weave — free